For The Atlantic’s January cowl story, “The Most Highly effective Man in Science,” employees author Michael Scherer profiles Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of well being and human providers, as he crusades in opposition to what he perceives because the corruption of the scientific institution. Scherer asks what it means when the nation can’t agree on frequent information—even these as soon as thought of validated by the scientific technique––and examines why RFK Jr. is so satisfied that he’s proper in his beliefs. “The entire medical institution has enormous stakes and equities that I’m now threatening,” Kennedy advised The Atlantic. “And I’m shocked President Trump lets me do it.”
Scherer had intensive entry to Kennedy and his prime deputies at HHS for the profile, together with Jay Bhattacharya, Marty Makary, and Mehmet Oz––all of whom had been bonded by the expertise of COVID “in a fellowship of the ostracized.” Since Trump put him answerable for HHS, Kennedy has, at the side of the White Home, pushed out about one in 4 HHS workers, together with a lot of the senior profession employees and 1000’s of employees on the CDC, which Kennedy described to Scherer as a “snake pit.” (Kennedy compares his relationship with Trump to “if you’re courting someone that you simply preserve liking an increasing number of.”) And although Kennedy has slashed the price range of his personal division, he now tells Scherer that he plans to spend billions of {dollars} investigating vaccines’ potential ties to continual ailments. Discussing COVID-vaccine boosters, Kennedy tells Scherer: “You by no means do an intervention—significantly with a wholesome human being—except you realize that it’s secure and efficient. And we don’t know if it’s secure and efficient.”
All through their interviews, Scherer writes, he typically discovered himself jousting with Kennedy concerning the particulars of 1 scientific debate or one other. Scherer writes that Kennedy says he’s open to listening to different viewpoints, however, “when introduced with information that contradict his arguments, Kennedy recurrently claims dangerous religion on the a part of his adversaries—that they’re motivated by revenue or skilled development. His expertise as a litigator might have made this reflexive. As John Morgan, his litigation associate, advised me, it’s laborious to sue polluters and cigarette firms and never come away satisfied that the defendants are ‘within the enterprise of premeditated homicide.’ Kennedy has utilized the identical lens to the medical institution, casting it as powered by the massive pharmaceutical firms and their authorities protectors—even though most pediatricians and virologists and epidemiologists have devoted their lives to serving to youngsters and lowering struggling.”
Further highlights from Scherer’s article:
On bodily threats: On the flight the place Kennedy discovered that Charlie Kirk had been shot, he advised Scherer that “his safety workforce lately circulated a memo warning him of threats to his personal life. ‘It stated the resentments in opposition to me had elevated “above the brink of lethality,” ’ he stated. Kennedy greeted the menace evaluation with exceptional equanimity for somebody together with his household’s historical past.”
Kennedy stated he advised Trump to not publish a warning on social media about pregnant girls taking Tylenol: “‘You may’t do this,’ Kennedy stated he advised the president. ‘There’s nuance to it, and you may’t scare folks away from Tylenol, and also you’re going to get an enormous quantity of pushback from highly effective pharmaceutical firms.’ Trump’s reply: ‘I don’t give a shit about that.’”
On Kennedy’s life as an addict in restoration, and his present nicotine and tanning habits: “Though Kennedy says he has not taken heroin since he bought clear, he nonetheless considers his mind to be a type of ‘formulation pharmacy,’ in a position to remodel something—mountain climbing, falconry, intercourse—right into a drug.”
“I requested him how a lot being an addict in restoration nonetheless impacts him. ‘I believe it’s formed every part,’ he stated. Whilst HHS secretary, he sponsors others in restoration. ‘I take calls on a regular basis.’”
“Once I requested him to sq. his nicotine behavior and the time he spends tanning with the federal well being advisories in opposition to each, he shifted in his chair. ‘I’m not telling those who they need to do something that I do,’ he stated. ‘I simply say “Get in form.”’ ”
On Kennedy’s claims that consultants are unwilling to debate him: “Even now that he sits atop America’s well being forms, Kennedy advised me, public-health authorities—whose convictions, he stated, are extra akin to faith than science—is not going to interact with him. … ‘You’re the HHS secretary,’ I stated. ‘Presumably you possibly can name anyone at CDC to have this debate.’ ‘There’s 21,000 folks in that company, and I’m not going to have a private debate with every one in every of them,’ he responded. ‘By the way in which, they’re leaving as a result of they will’t defend their place.’”
Kennedy on “trusting the consultants” as a “function of totalitarianism and faith”: “‘Trusting the consultants’ will not be a function of science,’ he likes to say. ‘It’s not a function of democracy. It’s a function of totalitarianism and faith.’ However having everybody ‘do their very own analysis,’ as Kennedy recommends, was untenable even earlier than the appearance of applied sciences like nanoscience and genomic modifying. Once I advised to Kennedy that he was now presuming to play the position of well being professional himself, he rejected that. ‘I don’t inform folks to belief me. I inform folks, “Don’t belief me.”’”
Senator Invoice Cassidy, a gastroenterologist who forged the deciding vote to verify Kennedy as HHS secretary, stated that “he and the HHS secretary recurrently share scientific articles and papers with one another. ‘I discover that he typically will ship me the identical article greater than as soon as,’ Cassidy advised me. But every time Cassidy factors out ‘statistical flaws’ within the article, he stated, Kennedy says he considers these ‘immaterial.’”
Kennedy on the media, and on this profile: “He advised that he regretted agreeing to speak with me, and in contrast our relationship to the fable of the scorpion who asks the frog for assist crossing a river, solely to sting and kill the frog after it does.
‘Each article about me is similar, which is rarely science-based; it’s by no means an argument; it’s at all times an advert hominem assault,’ he continued. ‘“He’s a conspiracy theorist, he’s anti-science, he’s a loopy individual, he’s bought a mind worm,” or the bear story, or the whale story, or the canine story, any of those, and that’s what they concentrate on.’ Articles about a few of these colourful episodes from his previous, he believed, had been efforts to distract from the substance of his arguments. ‘I problem you to inform me one conspiracy that I’ve talked about that has not come true,’ he stated.”
Michael Scherer’s “The Most Highly effective Man in Science” was printed at present at TheAtlantic.com. Please attain out with any questions or requests.
Press contacts:
Anna Bross and Paul Jackson | The Atlantic
[email protected]
