A laboratory learning sickle cell illness on the Nationwide Coronary heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Mobile and Molecular Therapeutics Laboratory, on the Nationwide Institutes of Well being on Feb. 8, 2024, in Bethesda, Md.
Brendan Smialowski/AFP by way of Getty Photographs
conceal caption
toggle caption
Brendan Smialowski/AFP by way of Getty Photographs
The Nationwide Institutes of Well being is capping an necessary sort of funding for medical analysis at universities, medical colleges, analysis hospitals and different scientific establishments.
Within the newest step by the Trump administration affecting scientific analysis, the NIH says the company is limiting funding for “oblique prices” to fifteen% of grants. That is far beneath what many establishments have been getting to take care of buildings and tools and pay assist employees and different overhead bills. For instance, Harvard receives 68% and Yale will get 67%, in keeping with the NIH.
The NIH says the brand new coverage, which marks a serious change in how the company funds analysis, is extra in line what non-public foundations pay.
“Most non-public foundations that fund analysis present considerably decrease oblique prices than the federal authorities, and universities readily settle for grants from these foundations,” the NIH says in a notification launched Friday saying the change.
“Though cognizant that grant recipients, significantly ‘new or inexperienced organizations,’ use grant funds to cowl oblique prices like overhead…NIH is obligated to rigorously steward grant awards to make sure taxpayer {dollars} are utilized in ways in which profit the American individuals and enhance their high quality of life,” the announcement says.
The NIH says the change will apply to each present and future grants, and even suggests the brand new coverage would apply retroactively. However in response to questions Saturday, the Well being and Human Providers Division, which oversees NIH, instructed NPR that whereas HHS does “have the authority to make these adjustments retrospective for present grants and require grantees to return the surplus overhead they’ve beforehand obtained,” officers have “at present chosen not to take action to ease the implementation of the brand new charge.” However “we are going to proceed to evaluate this coverage alternative and whether or not it’s in the most effective curiosity of the American taxpayer.”
NIH spent greater than $35 billion in 2023 fiscal 12 months on almost 50,000 grants to greater than 300,000 researchers at greater than 2,500 universities, medical colleges, and different analysis establishments within the U.S., the company says. This consists of $9 billion for oblique prices.
The brand new coverage, which matches into impact Monday, is being condemned by many researchers.
“This can be a surefire method to cripple lifesaving analysis and innovation,” Matt Owens, president of the Council on Authorities Relations, an affiliation of analysis universities and tutorial medical facilities, stated in an announcement. “Reimbursement of services and administrative expenditures are half and parcel of the entire prices of conducting world class analysis.”
Owens says his group is “rigorously reviewing this coverage change because it contradicts present regulation and coverage.”
“America’s rivals will relish this self-inflicted wound,” Owens says. “We urge NIH leaders to rescind this harmful coverage earlier than its harms are felt by Individuals.”
These sentiments have been echoed by different medical researchers.
“We’re all reeling,” Dr. George Daley, the dean of the Harvard Medical College, wrote NPR in an e mail. “This might decimate medical analysis.”
The announcement comes as many researchers are already anxious due to different steps the brand new administration has taken, together with proscribing communication and journey by the NIH and different federal well being companies and freezing some analysis grants.
